Dear Editor:

In response to Hoppy Kercheval's recent opinion piece on your website, I think coal WILL come "roaring back."

When it is not crippled by over-regulation, coal, not natural gas, is usually the least expensive option. If you tied his legs together and his hands behind his back, basketball star Lebron James would lose in a one on one against even me.

Similarly, under the Obama administration, coal was not allowed to compete in a fair and open marketplace with other energy sources; so naturally it often lost out.

Natural gas should be saved for applications it does especially well, such as: heating, cooking, transportation, fertilizers and in the manufacture of fabrics, glass, steel, plastics, paint, and other products.

Using it for base load power generation is a waste when the U.S. has so much high quality coal there for the taking. Using gas for base load power generation is like a reverse Midas touch, turning gold into lead.

Sincerely,

Tom Harris

Ottawa, Ontario

(Editor's Note: Harris is executive director of the Toronto-based International Climate Science Coalition. ICSC includes participants from across the political spectrum and is not a lobby group for any industry.)

Want to get notified whenever we write about U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ?
Next time we write about U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20460

More News