West Virginia Record

Thursday, February 27, 2020

Former employee accuses attorney of sexual harassment

By Chris Dickerson | Apr 30, 2015


CHARLESTON – A former employee of a Charleston law firm has filed a lawsuit alleging one of the firm’s attorneys sexually harassed her.

Kylan Wilson filed her last suit earlier this month in Kanawha Circuit Court against M. Andrew Brison and Anspach Meeks Ellenberger LLP, also known as Anspach Law.

In her complaint, the 22-year-old Dunbar resident says she worked for Anspach Law from December 2013 through Oct. 21, 2014, and that Brison was her direct supervisor. During her employment there, Wilson says Brison subjected her to “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and her and other co-workers to verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature” that interfered with their work and “created an intimidating, hostile and offensive working environment.”

She also claims her termination from the firm was because she rebuffed Brison’s sexual advances and because she complaint of the sexual harassment to officials with the firm, which she says knew of his conduct through investigation of incidents.

Wilson says Brison sent her a series of “unwelcome, inappropriate and sexually oriented text messages.”

In those messages, according to the complaint, Brison requested to “come over and cuddle with” Wilson, referred to “stalking” her,” told her she was “sexy” and that she made it “hard for him to act appropriately in the office.” He also allegedly wrote that he would kiss her the next time she came into his office, that was “obsessed” with her, that he would “love to curl your toes” and that “we can come back into the office after hours. He also made reference to raising her children if something happened to her spouse.

Also, Wilson claims Brison posted messages on Facebook intended to threaten her. He later claimed his Facebook account was hacked, then later said he posted the messages but didn’t intend them to be directed specifically at Wilson.

“Brison told the plaintiff repeatedly her employment status was in danger of being terminated by defendant Anspach Law in an attempt to gain sexual favors,” the complaint states.

She says Brison also kissed her hand, rubbed his fingers through her hair and rubbed her shoulders. She says he also said he told her they needed to meet outside the office for work business, constantly asked her to go get drinks with him and told her she was going to be fired. She says he also accessed her cell phone without her permission.

Wilson says she reported Brison’s behavior to Anspach Law’s chief operating officer, who told her Brison “was not dangerous.” The firm told Wilson not to come to work – without pay – while it investigated her claims. That later was changed to time off with pay, she states.

“During alleged ‘investigation,’ defendant Anspach Law’s chief operating office told witnesses they would be disciplined if the sexual harassment alleged by plaintiff had occurred and the employee witnesses did not report it prior,” Wilson’s complaint states. “Defendant Anspach Law insisted its employee witnesses should not discuss this with anyone, and that plaintiff seemed to be ‘lying,’ all in an attempt to cover-up the sexual harassment rather than actually take affirmative action to punish the sexual harassment.”

She says the firm knew other female secretaries refused to work for Brison.

Still, Wilson claims she was wrongfully terminated, a violation of the West Virginia Human Rights Act. She says she also was a victim of unlawful retaliation and gender discrimination.

She says the firm tried to get her to sign a “Confidential Separation Agreement and General Release” for a payment of $3,466.67, but she refused. She says she also won an unemployment insurance claim with Workforce West Virginia against the firm, saying she was not guilty of any actions causing her to be terminated.

She claims she has suffered emotional distress, embarrassment, humiliation and other damages. She seeks compensation for those damages as well as back pay, front pay, loss of benefits, damage to her reputation, annoyance, inconvenience, court costs and attorneys fees. She also seeks punitive damages because of the malicious and intention conduct of the defendants.

Wilson also seeks to have the court order the defendants to not influence and/or intimidate witnesses in the case.

She is being represented by Charleston attorney John Einreinhofer and Bernie Layne III of Mani, Ellis & Layne PLLC. The case has been assigned to Circuit Judge Jim Stucky.

Kanawha Circuit Court case number: 15-C-698

Want to get notified whenever we write about ?

Sign-up Next time we write about , we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.