By Denise Simpson | Nov 18, 2011

Oct. 31
Pamela Fleming, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated vs. BFS Fast Food and 4FLC Partners, LP
PA- Sandra K. Law; J- Wilson
* Plaintiff and Class members are entitled to damages, including unpaid wages and benefits for those employed at various times between 2006 to 2011. Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury.
Case number: 11-C-362

Marilyn Greaver vs. Rite Aid Corporation, The Protector and Gamble Co. et al.
PA- Barry Hill; J- Wilson
* Greaver, a 51-year-old mother of two, purchased Fixodent from Rite Aid. As a result to plaintiff's use, she suffered copper deficiency, other hematological injuries, as well as extremely debilitating and permanent neurological injuries that require her to use a wheelchair. She has suffered extensive medical expenses and will need tremendous care for the remainder of her life. Compensatory damages for harm and losses along with punitive damages are sought.
Case number: 11-C-363

Nov. 2
Thomas E. McIntire, Administrator CTA DBN of the Estate of Russell LeLand Evans Sr. Deceased vs. Russell LeLand Evans Jr., Lorrie Ann Ingold, and Rebecca Lynn Miner
PA- Thomas E. McIntire; J- Recht
* Plaintiff alleges that defendants have converted, concealed, embezzled, or conveyed away assets belonging to the Estate of Russell Leland Evans Sr. On Oct. 20, 2005, Evans signed and published his last will and testament. He died on Nov. 23, 2009; following his will was admitted to probate. Defendants should have known that removing assets was an act adverse to other beneficiaries of the estate. Judgment is demanded that defendants be ordered to return personal property in their possession belonging to the Estate of Evans Sr.
Case number: 11-C-365

Kristin Seabright vs. Encompass Insurance Company
PA- David A. Jividen; J- Recht
* Plaintiff was in an accident on Nov. 9, 2009, and was provided underinsured motorist coverage by defendant. A direct result of the acts of Timothy Anderson gave resulted in general damages to Seabright. Encompass waived the right to subrogate yet plaintiff is entitled to UIM benefits under her policy. The Court is asked to grant her such compensatory damages.
Case number: 11-C-367

More News

The Record Network