Dear Editor:

In response to Hoppy Kercheval's recent opinion piece on your website, I think coal WILL come "roaring back."

When it is not crippled by over-regulation, coal, not natural gas, is usually the least expensive option. If you tied his legs together and his hands behind his back, basketball star Lebron James would lose in a one on one against even me.

Similarly, under the Obama administration, coal was not allowed to compete in a fair and open marketplace with other energy sources; so naturally it often lost out.

Natural gas should be saved for applications it does especially well, such as: heating, cooking, transportation, fertilizers and in the manufacture of fabrics, glass, steel, plastics, paint, and other products.

Using it for base load power generation is a waste when the U.S. has so much high quality coal there for the taking. Using gas for base load power generation is like a reverse Midas touch, turning gold into lead.

Sincerely,

Tom Harris

Ottawa, Ontario

(Editor's Note: Harris is executive director of the Toronto-based International Climate Science Coalition. ICSC includes participants from across the political spectrum and is not a lobby group for any industry.)

Want to get notified whenever we write about U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ?
Next time we write about U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC - 20460

More News