CSX files answer to EEOC complaint, denies discrimination

By Kyla Asbury | Oct 10, 2017

HUNTINGTON – CSX filed an answer to a lawsuit alleging it had discriminatory hiring practices. CSX denies the discrimination.

In its affirmative defenses, CSX alleges the complaint fails to state a claim, that multiple claims in the suit are barred by statutes of limitation and because the class members failed to exhaust administrative remedies, according to the Sept. 29 answer.

CSX is seeking that the lawsuit be dismissed.

CSX admits that Amanda Hutchison filed a charge of discrimination with EEOC in 2010, alleging Title VII violations with the IPCS Test for material handler/clerks at the defendant’s Huntington facility. 

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed the lawsuit against CSX in August in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.

Since at least 2008, CSX has conducted isokinetic strength testing as a requirement for workers to be selected for various jobs.

The EEOC claims the strength test, known as the IPCS Biodex, causes a discriminatory impact on female workers seeking jobs as conductor, material handler/clerk and a number of other job categories.

CSX purports to use the IPCS Biodex to measure upper- and lower-body muscle strength, according to the suit.

The EEOC claims that female workers who have taken the test pass at significantly lower rates as compared to their male counterparts.

CSX has used two other employment tests, one purporting to measure aerobic capacity and one seeking to test arm endurance, as a requirement for selection into certain jobs, and female workers also passed those tests at significantly lower rates as compared to male workers, according to the suit.

The EEOC claims CSX declined to hire a class of women workers for a range of jobs they sought because they failed these tests, and the effect of company testing practices has been to discriminate against women workers because of their sex.   

Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on sex, according to the suit.

The EEOC claims Title VII prohibits employment practices such as tests that are administered to all applicants and employees regardless of sex but that cause a discriminatory effect or impact on persons of a particular sex.

Employers using tests for employment selection purposes that cause a significant discriminatory effect or impact based on sex, or any other covered basis, must prove that those practices are necessary for safe and efficient performance of the specific jobs for which the tests are used, according to the suit.

The EEOC claims even if such necessity is proven, the tests are prohibited by Title VII if it is shown that there are alternative practices that can achieve the employers' objectives but have a less discriminatory effect.

The EEOC first attempted to reach a pre-litigation settlement with CSX through its administrative conciliation process, according to a press release.

The EEOC is seeking injunctive relief and court-ordered job instatement as well as payment of monetary remedies in the form of post and future lost wages and benefits to a class of female workers adversely affected by the testing. It is being represented by James L. Lee, Gwendolyn Young Reams, Debra M. Lawrence, Ronald L. Phillips, Lisa H. Hernandez, Carol A. Casto and Stephen M. Horn.

CSX is represented by Melissa Foster Bird of Nelson Mullins; and Deborah A. Sudbury and Elaine Rogers Walsh of Jones Day.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia case number: 3:17-cv-03731

Want to get notified whenever we write about any of these organizations ?

Sign-up Next time we write about any of these organizations, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

CSX Transportation Jones Day Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Huntington Division

More News

The Record Network