West Virginia Record

Thursday, April 9, 2020

Supreme Court suspends attorney's law license for two years

Attorneys & Judges

By Kyla Asbury | Mar 24, 2020

General court 10

CHARLESTON — The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals suspended the law license of an attorney for two years.

Justice John Hutchison authored the March 20 opinion and the court determined the two-year suspension from the practice of law, along with the other recommendations is appropriate.

Daniel R. Grindo has been a licensed member of the West Virginia State Bar since 2002.


The investigative panel of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board issued a formal statement of charges against Grindo in 2018 for misconduct surrounding vouchers he submitted for payment of his time and expenses on court-appointed representations of indigent criminal defendants.

The Hearing Panel Subcommittee (HPS) held an evidentiary hearing on Feb. 25, 2019, and found that between 2013 and 2015, Grindo did a large amount of court-appointed criminal defense in his practice.

When Public Defenders Services (PDS) began using new software in 2015, it discovered that Grindo had submitted vouchers claiming that he had worked on appointed criminal cases for more than 30 hours in a single day on five different dates, more than 24 hours a day on 16 dates, more than 20 hours a day on 47 dates and more than 15 hours a day on 96 dates. 

PDS also discovered that Grindo had submitted duplicate mileage claims, constituting $1,927.86 in overpayments.

PDS Executive Director Dana Eddy contacted Grindo and they entered into a conciliation agreement in 2015 where Grindo admitted that he had billed for work performed by his non-attorney staff at the attorney rate.

As part of the agreement, Grindo agreed to reimburse PDS by accepting a one-third reduction of the total amount of fees claimed on all of his vouchers currently held by the PDS and he was required to pay back the $1,927.26, but by May 2017, he still hadn't.

Grindo also told Eddy he had self-reported the incident to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), but Grindo had not done so. Eddy testified that he believed Grindo had lied to him to dissuade him from filing an ethics complaint.

The HPS recommended Grindo's license be suspended for two years and that he must complete six additional hours of continuing legal education in ethics. Grindo must also petition for reinstatement.

Hutchison wrote that the court agreed with the HPS's conclusion sanctions. If Grindo's license is later reinstated, he is prohibited from engaging in work compensated from the PDS.

West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals case number: 18-0869

Want to get notified whenever we write about West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals ?

Sign-up Next time we write about West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals