3,000 part of DuPont medical monitoring plan

By Jessica M. Karmasek | Sep 13, 2011

MORGANTOWN -- A spokesman for DuPont says more than 3,000 West Virginians have enrolled in a court-administered medical monitoring program.

About 6,700 people submitted claim forms, DuPont spokesman Dan Turner told The Associated Press.

However, some still need to be reviewed by the claims administrator and others have decided to opt out, Turner said.

Meanwhile, those who completed forms, which helped create a database for the program, were paid $400.

Turner said many were simply submitting the forms but declining the medical monitoring.

Last month, Harrison Circuit Judge Thomas Bedell ruled that a group of plaintiffs who settled a personal injury case with the company earlier this year could now enroll in the program.

DuPont had argued there was no reason for a person to be monitored if they're already sick.

Bedell, in his ruling, disagreed.

"In seeking medical monitoring, the present personal injury plaintiffs are not attempting to 'have it both ways.' Clear West Virginia precedent dictates that a claim for medical monitoring is a separate cause of action."

In January, Bedell approved a $70 million settlement involving the alleged contamination of the Harrison County community of Spelter by the company.

DuPont is alleged to have released cadmium, arsenic and lead from one of its smelters into the community, located just north of Clarksburg.

The site was originally a DuPont gunpowder mill that opened in 1899. After the mill burned down, Grasselli Chemical Co. built a zinc smelter and a company town. DuPont then bought Grasselli in 1928 and operated the smelter until 1950. The company eventually repurchased the smelter and worked to clean it up.

Bedell had previously ruled that the retrial of part of the case was to start in March. Last June, the state's Supreme Court of Appeals rejected DuPont's petition for rehearing, which asked the Court to further cut punitive damages.

The Court had shaved a $196 million punitives award by 40 percent, but DuPont sought to increase that figure to 70 percent.

The justices said DuPont entered a special master's recommendation of 70 percent too late. They remanded the case and ordered a new trial to determine if the case was filed in a timely manner.

However, after considering the "substantial amount of risk and expense" of going to trial again, the parties reached a settlement.

As part of the $70 million settlement, $4 million was to be made available only for the medical monitoring sub-class of plaintiffs and the money would be deposited into the Qualified Settlement Fund account created solely for that purpose. Also, DuPont was ordered to pay for the cost of a medical monitoring program on a "pay-as-you-go basis" for a period of 30 years.

Testing, which includes blood and urine tests, is set to begin Nov. 1 and will be repeated every two years, according to the AP.

Want to get notified whenever we write about DuPont ?

Sign-up Next time we write about DuPont, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story


More News

The Record Network