Quantcast

WEST VIRGINIA RECORD

Friday, April 26, 2024

Tim Hortons lawsuit filed by pregnant former employee settled

CHARLESTON - A lawsuit filed by a former employee who sued Tim Hortons after she claimed she was fired because she was pregnant has been settled and dismissed.

L&S Coffee Inc. and Beverly Lasater were also named as defendants in the suit.

On Aug. 14, a Final Dismissal Order was filed in Kanawha Circuit Court, by both parties and their counsel, who moved to dismiss the action from the docket with prejudice.

Theresa Ann Norwalk and the defendants announced to the court that all matters and differences have been settled, compromised and agreed and moved the court to dismiss the action from the docket, according to the final dismissal order.

On Aug. 15, 2009, Norwalk began her employment with the defendants, according to a complaint filed May 5, 2011, in Kanawha Circuit Court.

Norwalk claimed she discovered she was pregnant on Feb. 26, 2010, and informed Lasater two days later.

In March 2010, Norwalk made a request to the defendants to switch shifts because of the lifting requirements during the overnight shift and Lasater eventually transferred Norwalk to the morning shift, according to the suit.

Norwalk claimed upon transferring her to morning shift, Lasater began to reduce her hours.

During March 2010, Norwalk suffered nausea and other pregnancy-related symptoms and also had to miss work because of a pregnancy-related doctor’s appointment, according to the suit.

Norwalk claimed Lasater issued a disciplinary notice against her for pregnancy-related matters such as going to the bathroom and going to the doctor.

On April 4, 2010, Norwalk called her employment to obtain her schedule for the week and spoke with the assistant manager, who informed her that she was not on the schedule for the following week and had been instructed to contact Lasater, according to the suit.

Norwalk claimed she contacted Lasater to ask her why she was not on the schedule and was told that “it was not working out and to come back after the baby was born.”

Lasater discharged Norwalk “due to availability to work her normal schedule because of condition,” according to the suit.

Norwalk claimed her pregnancy was the condition and that her employment was terminated because she was pregnant.

The defendant also failed to pay Norwalk her final employment wages within 72 hours, according to the suit.

Norwalk was seeking compensatory and punitive damages with pre- and post-judgment interest. She was represented by Todd S. Bailess and Joy B. Mega of Bailess Law.

The defendants were represented by Michael E. Estep and Nathanial A. Kuratomi of Jenkins Fenstermaker PLLC.

The case was assigned to Circuit Judge Charles E. King.

Kanawha Circuit Court case number: 11-C-728

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News